|
|
|
|
BENGAL DINER, 98, KING STREET NB I see from the 2006 Yellow Pages that this establishment is now caller Tharer's Indian Brasserie. Whether this indicates new ownership/chef I don't know, but it sounds as though it has had a facelift to become another of the contemporary style Indian restaurants. Until I can re-visit, any comment or update from readers would be welcome. (Malcolm Wilkins - July 2006)NNB I see from the 2007 Yellow Pages that it doesn't appear at all! I believe yet another restaurant has opened on the site, but unsure whether the same ownership. Updates please! (Malcolm Wilkins - July 2007) Until this uncertainty is resolved I retain the most recent report. This is
the site of the first Indian restaurant in Kent, opened in 1965 by Mr S Meah and
run by him until the summer of 2003 when he retired. Its previous name was The
Curry Inn and I reported on it about a year ago when I found the food good,
the service laid back, prices cheap and the décor sticking to the imitation
flock wall and traditional old Indian restaurant layout. The restaurant has now
had a change of ownership, being run by the same people who own the Shamrat
in Maidstone, and a change of chef. I wish Mr Meah a long and happy retirement
and went to try out the new restaurant. At first
sight it is little different that before. Still the long line of tables set
closely together along each wall and seating about 50, and the furniture looks
the same. And it was just as empty. However, the imitation flock wallpaper has
been replaced by plain cream paint and the pictures are gone. The service was
also sharper and more friendly (Mr Meah apart, of course). The menu largely
followed the same extensive pattern as before, as did the prices. We had the
same meal for comparison purposes. The
starter of Onion Bhajia showed there was a different chef. Previously it was
four large (and I mean large - cricket ball size) round type without salad garnish, while this time
they were two large flat type with salad and riata. They were fairly solid but
with plenty of onion and tastily spiced. Chicken
Tikka Pathia, which as before included a full portion of rice, was fairly spicy
although not quite so hot as previously (I described it a year ago as having
“a strong, gutsy spicing and hotness which set the mouth a-tingle”).
Nevertheless, it was quite acceptable. The Tandoori Chicken was a standard
version – probably not quite so tasty as previously (reported as being
“darkly coloured and marinated to impart a char grilled effect in places”)
It seemed a typical high street tandoori chicken although my wife – the main
recipient – felt there was an unidentifiable underlying taste which she could
only describe as rather cheesy. She felt it was below the average offering, and
who am I to argue. However, we both agreed that the Dry Mixed Vegetable was very
good, with large pieces of vegetables lightly cooked and very pleasantly spiced,
and better than average (last time was a pretty standard version). All in
all a typical high street curry house serving formula curry. The prices are
still very reasonable (still under £20 for the two of us), portions quite
sufficient, if slightly less than previously, and the service friendly and
efficient But
now that it has lost the claim of being the longest standing Indian restaurant
in Kent, and lost its old fashioned flock walls and ambience of well-used,
slightly faded history, it has lost some of the reasons for going there. There
are better Indian restaurants in Maidstone (its sister restaurant the Shamrat
for one) and it is in the ‘dead’ end of town. Nobody else came in the whole
time we were there, not even for a take-away, and nobody had been there before
us. The manager said it was ‘quiet' (dead more like) during the week but did
its trade Friday and Saturday evenings. With this scenario I can’t really see
it lasting, which will be a shame given its history* (NB See comments at start
of report). Malcolm Wilkins - November 2003
|